Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Azorius Omniscience | evhuner | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Azorius Control | theslickshotgang | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Dimir Control | qqqwwweee | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Azorius Omniscience | dazai | 9-1 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053 |
Azorius Control | andoru011120 | 4-1 | None |
Azorius Control , Azorius Omniscience , Azorius Synthesizer , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Midrange , Domain Zur Overlords , Esper Pixie
Change the Equation ranks #170 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 50%).
Blue average: 58.7%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Change the Equation is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 15.67 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.7%. Change the Equation has a win rate of 66.1%, making it 5.1% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Soul-Guide Lantern | Artifact | 20 | 70.6% | 9 |
Gix's Command | Sorcery | 5 | 67.2% | 0 |
Spyglass Siren | Creature — Siren Pirate | 5 | 67.2% | 0 |
Kaito, Bane of Nightmares | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 5 | 67.2% | 0 |
Enduring Curiosity | Enchantment Creature — Cat Glimmer | 6 | 66.0% | 0 |
Spell Pierce | Instant | 5 | 64.3% | 2 |
Blot Out | Instant | 27 | 64.0% | 7 |
Shoot the Sheriff | Instant | 14 | 60.5% | 4 |
Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 30 | 58.9% | 7 |
Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 22 | 58.7% | 4 |
Cards that perform better with Change the Equation than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 3 | 7 | 77.1% | 67.1% | +10.1% |
Mazemind Tome | Artifact | 2 | 6 | 69.8% | 67.4% | +2.3% |
Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 69.2% | 67.4% | +1.8% |
Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 67.3% | -0.6% |
Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 7 | 66.0% | 68.1% | -2.1% |
Jace, the Perfected Mind | Legendary Planeswalker — Jace | 4 | 7 | 63.6% | 66.1% | -2.5% |
Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 10 | 65.2% | 67.9% | -2.7% |
Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 17 | 66.1% | 69.0% | -2.8% |
Get Lost | Instant | 2 | 10 | 64.6% | 68.1% | -3.5% |
Negate | Instant | 2 | 15 | 64.7% | 68.9% | -4.1% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Azorius Control | 129 | 35.2% | 48.7% |
Dimir Control | 36 | 49.3% | 56.2% |
Dimir Midrange | 15 | 0.7% | 46.1% |
Unknown Archetype | 7 | 2.2% | 51.2% |
Dimir Bounce | 6 | 1.2% | 57.5% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.